2008
| Author | Snowball, Lucy |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan, 2008 |
| Source/Publisher | Criminology Research Council |
| Download | Download Full Text |
| Link(s) | http://criminologyresearchcouncil.gov.au/reports/200607-C02.html |
| Subjects | Juvenile justice |
This study was motivated by a concern that Indigenous juvenile offenders were not receiving the benefits of diversionary schemes. Its aim was to assess how much of a difference in the rate of diversion between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders remained after adjusting for offender characteristics and other factors. A series of logistic regression models were developed to see whether the likelihood of diversion was influenced by an individual’s Indigenous status, after controlling for a range of offence and offender characteristics. Diversion was modelled as both a dichotomous variable (diversion/non-diversion) and as an ordered variable (in order: Caution, Conference, Court). The data to construct the models was obtained from Western Australia, South Australia and New South Wales. Diversion was defined as either a police or court referred conference or a formal police caution, while non-diversion was defined as a court appearance. The results were as follows: in all three states, Indigenous offenders were diverted at a lower rate than non-Indigenous offenders; when controls were included for age, sex, current offence characteristics and prior history, this discrepancy in rates of diversion reduced, but remained significant and relatively strong; Indigenous offenders were found to be more likely to have had previous contact with the justice system and a larger number of prior contacts. The report concludes that in order to reduce the disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous rates of diversion, it would be useful to address the high rate of Indigenous juvenile offending.
Related Items© Criminology Research Grants program, Material appearing at this site constitutes copyright of the Australian Institute of Criminology, the Commonwealth of Australia or the Criminology Research Grants program unless otherwise endorsed. Material on this site does not necessarily reflect the policy position of the Australian Government. Material on this site is intended for your general use and information. You may distribute any copies of downloaded material, in unaltered, complete form only, for your personal, non-commercial use subject to proper attribution of the Australian Institute of Criminology, Criminology Research Council, the Commonwealth of Australia and other authors as the case may be. All other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to: Manager, Communications and Information Services Australian Institute of Criminology GPO Box 2944 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Contact the Criminology Grants program The Criminology Research Grants program is committed to making its research available to the whole community. Accessibility is one of the key goals of the website. The HTML pages on our site comply as far as possible with the Priority 2 checkpoints of the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). These standards are endorsed by Australia's Government Online initiative. As well as a wide variety of information about the Criminology Research Grants program and its work, the site includes full text of all current Council reports as PDF documents. The CRG's published output consists largely of reports containing significant numbers of data tables, combined with analytical text.