2011
Author | Crofts, Thomas; Mitchell, Tanya |
---|---|
Date | Nov, 2011 |
Source/Publisher | Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 23(2), pp277-285 |
Link(s) | http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/CICrimJust/2011/31.html |
Subjects | Criminal justice system |
It has been 20 years since the report of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody which drew attention to the alarmingly disproportionate levels of Indigenous people in custody. The rate of this representation has continued to climb and the causes of the shameful inequalities have been well documented. And yet, governments continue to adopt crime and punishment policies which do not take into enough regard the effect these measures will have on Indigenous offenders or the rate of Indigenous incarceration. One recent example is the application of prohibited behaviour orders which although considered ineffective in the UK (ASBO) context, have been applied in Western Australia. It is likely that the disproportionate targeting, over-criminalisation and net-widening effects of the ABSO will also apply in the Western Australian context, where insufficient attention has been paid to the effect that such orders might have, particularly in the State with the highest rates of Aboriginal imprisonment. This commentary identifies the limitations of a PBO model that will likely exacerbate issues of Indigenous overrepresentation in the criminal justice system (abstract, edited).
Copyright in content on AustLII (a) AustLII is not the copyright owner in the source documents published on AustLII and is not able to give permission for reproduction of those source documents. (b) AustLII claims copyright in all value-added content that it adds to source documents (including hypertext mark-up, and alternative citations). On request, AustLII usually gives permission for reproduction of examples of this content for teaching, training or similar purposes. The University of Sydney owns the copyright in the information provided on this site, unless stated otherwise. Material on this site is subject to copyright under Australian law and through international treaties, applicable law in other countries. Individuals may copy a reasonable portion of the material on this site under the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 provided it is used for research or study or for criticism or review. Educational institutions may reproduce limited amounts of material from this site under Part VB of the Copyright Act Apart from these specified uses material from this site may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without prior written permission of the University of Sydney.