2002
Author | Biber, Katherine |
---|---|
Date | 2002 |
Source/Publisher | Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 13(3), pp286-300 |
Link(s) | http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/CICrimJust/2002/3.html |
Subjects | Policing |
In Smith v The Queen, the High Court ruled that identification evidence based on police inspection of a bank security camera photograph of a hooded, apparently Aboriginal bank robber, was irrelevant and therefore inadmissible under section 55 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cwlth). Mundarra Smith’s conviction was quashed and a retrial was ordered. This paper examines the eyewitness testimony given in the original case, and Smith’s own reaction on being shown the photograph, and finds that the case raises concerns about the use of photographic technologies in the policing and criminalisation of Aboriginal individuals and communities. The photographs offer a kind of visual confirmation of a psychosocial assumption that conflates blackness with deviance.
© 2002-15 The University of Sydney.The University of Sydney owns the copyright in the information provided on this site, unless stated otherwise. Material on this site is subject to copyright under Australian law and through international treaties, applicable law in other countries. Individuals may copy a reasonable portion of the material on this site under the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 provided it is used for research or study or for criticism or review. Educational institutions may reproduce limited amounts of material from this site under Part VB of the Copyright Act Apart from these specified uses material from this site may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without prior written permission of the University of Sydney. Copyright in content on AustLII (a) AustLII is not the copyright owner in the source documents published on AustLII and is not able to give permission for reproduction of those source documents. (b) AustLII claims copyright in all value-added content that it adds to source documents (including hypertext mark-up, and alternative citations). On request, AustLII usually gives permission for reproduction of examples of this content for teaching, training or similar purposes.